|
Baconian
i) That Francis Bacon is the probable author of the literary works ascribed to the actor William Shakespeare, either alone or as head of a creative group. ii) That Bacon was not only the genius behind Shakespeare, but also the true author of certain other English. and even European masterpieces such as Don Quixote. This is often deemed part of an elaborate conspiracy undertaken by a Freemasonic or Rosicrucian order for the purpose of raising the consciousness of the world, exploiting the power of printing to disseminate spiritually-elevating thoughts. (It should also be noted that some who believe in a benign Rosicrucian cultural conspiracy reject or ignore the question of Bacon authorship of Shakespeare). Many Baconians of the esoteric persuasion hold that Bacon and his fellow occultists encoded secret messages or cryptograms into printed books, using both text and image. Bacon himself is believed by some to have told an outlandish secret history through such cryptogrammic methods. Baconiana Birth of Time Time, Chronos in Greek was associated with the ancient deity Kronos, in turn associated with the planet known to us as Saturn. Kronos' greatest masculine child was Zeus. With his lifelong familiarity with classical poetry and allegory (much of it published in his The Wisdom of the Ancients), Bacon was surely associated his work with Zeus, greatest of all Greek gods. Friedmans It is interesting to observe that both Friedmans' lives were directly influenced by Baconianism. William's original interest in cryptography was sparked by the Shakespeare cryptogram literature, and Elizabeth had even worked as an assistant for the great Baconian Elizabeth Wells Gallup, who was the only deciphere they were unable to refute outright in their book. Great Instauration Idols 1. Idols of the Tribe - arising from human mind's tendency to judge the world by itself, thus distorting truth rather than reflecting it. This perennial human buas is often criticised as anthropocentrism in our time. 2. Idols of the Cave - these are personal to each individual and coloured by particular life-experiences, reading, education etc. Thus thought is biased by the arbitrary emphases of a person's own life, which are overrated in importance. 3. Idols of the Market-Place - language and human communication disrupt thought, in that careless language makes the discovery truth impossible. This area of philosophy had to wait until Ludwig Wittgenstein in the 20th century to receive a treatment worthy of Bacon's remarkably pithy treatment. 4. Idols of the Theatre - Bacon regarded all previous philosophies as fictions or stage-plays, whereby philosophers explained life through imaginary entities. Examples used by Bacon include the "element of fire" and the "Prime Mover" of earlier philosophy. Inductive Method This attitude of Bacon's, and its context in Novum Organum, became so prevalent that it virtually formed the basis of scientific thought - in theory. However, no single scientist after Bacon ever used his method of induction, and inevitably his philosophy of science came under attack from Sir Karl Popper and others, who see science as following a 'hypothetical-deductive' method. This has led to much pedantic wrangling about whether Bacon deserves to be called scientific by the (lofty) standards of today's science. However, it is arguable that as computer science and other information disciplines develop, a rediscovery of Bacon's methodology is likely to occur. Rawley, William (1588-1667) Royal Society The famous title piece of Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society (1667) shows a bust of Charles II flanked by William, Viscount Brouncker, first president of the Society and Bacon, described as Artium Instaurator. Secret History What may give sceptics pause for thought is that a reasonable proportion of these claims stand up to historical scrutiny, quite apart from their intrinsic interest and curiosity value as unintentional historical romances. Although developed by non-rational means, some of the 'secret history' is far from totally absurd. If this is so, it is probably because even the most irrational Baconians have had a historical grasp and empathy for Elizabethan England that is on a par with leading orthodox academics. Stratfordian Tenison, Thomas (1636-1715) "And those who have true skill in the Works of the Lord Verulam, like great Masters in Painting, can tell by the Design, the Strength, the way of Colouring, whether he was the Author of this or the other Piece, though his Name be not to it". (Tenison's Baconiana, 1679, p.78) |
Return to
Homepage Links |